Cinefantastique readers might find the extended comments and discussion at Groovy Age of interest in connection with this subject matter’s post. For my response, Curt’s argument hinges upon specific definitions of “Christianity,” “horror,” and “compatibility” that I do not accept, in addition to disagreein with the further arguments he advances in support of his thesis. As an interesting side note, in my view, the definitions Curt uses which lead to his incompatibility thesis are the same as those used by fundamentalist and many evangelical Christians who arrive at the same conclusion. Both do so erroneously in my view, as my specific essays on this topic as well as the overall thrust of TheoFantastique indicate.

Thanks again for weighing in on this.