Underdog (2007) – Fantasy Film Review

There's no need to fear - Underdog is here!Timmy, the imaginary five-year-old nephew I took with me to see this movie, opines:

I liked this movie lots and lots. The best parts were the parts I already seen, where they show you the parts of the movie before the movie comes out, but there was some other good parts too like the part where Underdog buries the bomb underground and the part where he flies in outer space. There was a part where a man dressed in a dress like a girl and that was pretty funny. I didn’t like the part too much where they put Underdog in the cage where the bad guy had his lab but that part didn’t last too long so it wasn’t too bad and it ended when Underdog got his Underdog powers and got out and the lab caught on fire but I couldn’t help wondering what happened to the other animals in the cages, I hoep they got out okay too.

The bad guy was little he was barely bigger than me but he could do lots of stuff and mayb if the mayor had listend to him none of this would have happened but big people never listen to little people cause they think we’re all stupid kids so they don’t listen and I just wish they had but they didn’t so the bad guy made Underdog by accident and then he made more super dogs and tried to blow up the city which was bad and it was kind of scary and the bad guy was kinda scary but I kinda liked him too cause he was little like me.

I didn’t like the part where Underdog was with Polly, that was mushy stuff like girls like but I’m not a girl so I don’t like it too much. I didnt understand why uncle Steve was laughing when Underdog and Polly were flying over the city, but he told me at least Polly doesnt talk bad poetry like Lois Lane. And I didnt get why uncle Steve was laughing too when Underdog and Polly were pushing a meatball with their noses and he said what’s the matter you stupid kid havent you ever seen lady and the tramp and I asked him what that was and he told me it was a cartoon like they used to make before they made computers which was a long time ago before I was born.

That reminds me i didnt understand the first part of the movie where it was like a cartoon, only like an old cartoon before they made computers, it looked all flat and funny not like cartoons nowadays look where they make them with computers. They showed underdog in the cartoon but it doesnt look like underdog really looks noawdays either. It was like they were telling me there used to be another underdog a long time ago before I was born but who cares about that anyways, I just like seeing underdog the way he looks nowadays. But I guess in the old days old people like the old underdog a lot and maybe that’s why they made the movie so I guess that’s okay too.

I should perhaps explain that, being imaginary, Timmy is not quite sure whether his intelligence level should conform to that of an actual five-year-old or expand to the level needed to make his current point. I’m sure he’ll work it out. You can read the rest of his comments below the fold.


The part I most didn’t like was where underdog ate the pill htat made him not underdoog any more he was just a normal dog like any other. It was because he was afraid hs owner boy only liked him when he was underdog but he just wanted to be a normal dog but if I was underdog i would keep my powers alwaYS. And uncle Steve said something about he was tired of movies where superheroes giv eup ther powers and he started talking about a bunch of old movies like superman 2 and spiderman 2 and fantastic four and superman returns and maybe some others but i wasn’t sure.

So anyways I like underdog a lot and I thought it was funny bcause they said pooh a lot and the dog said he would eat his own barf which is gross but it made me laugh. I liked the underdog song too but the one at the start of the movie was lots better than the one at th end of the movie which sounded kind a like gangsta-rap which i don’t listen to cause uncle Steve says it makes you want to hurt girls and shoot cops and…

I never said that!

Although Timmy sums up the strengths and weaknesses of the film fairly well (he has the makings of a fine critic), I do want to make some points of my own:

  1. The essential cartooniness of the plot and the gags works against the rather lame attempt to lather on a message about reconciliation between father and son. The movie might have worked better as an all CGI-flick like THE INCREDIBLES, although part of the fun, clearly, is seeing what looks like a real dog perform all these amazing Superman-style stunts.         
  2. There are some good people in the cast (Jim Belushi, Patrick Warburton, and especially Peter Dinklage as Dr. Simon Barsinister), but they mostly get the leftover bones of dialogue while all the treats go to the talking dog-star.
  3. The film fails my essential tests for spoofs, which is that they should be made just as well as if they were serious. Being funny should not be a license to be lame or second-rate. For example, Dr. Evil in the AUSTIN POWERS movies is great because he is as well delineated as the villain in any Bond film.
  4. One of the film’s charms is that Underdog is a bit of a klutz, and he always remains a dog, even after he is enhanced with superpowers. Rather like Peter Parker in the first SPIDER-MAN movie, Underdog does not quite know how to handle his new abilities, which lends itself to some good sight gags and prevents the film from lapsing into totally generic superhero action.
  5. No matter how lame some of the gags are, and no matter how badly the script bungles some of the action (watch the way Molly [Taylor Momsen] stumbles right into the villain’s hands near the end, just to provide a damsel in distress for Underdog to save), films like this retain a certain undeniable appeal, and not just for animal lovers and kids. My theory is that the heroic archetype continues to exert a pull over modern viewers, but in these cynical times it is hard to believe in cinematic heroes who are purely good; they seem too one-dimensional, too cornball. But when your hero is a dog, it is acceptable – even expected - for his characterization to be lacking in nuance and shades of gray. After all, it’s a dog – what do you expect, Hamlet?


UNDERDOG (2007). Directed by Frederik Du Chau. Screenplay by Adam Rifkin and Joe Piscatella & Craig A. Williams, based on the animated television series. Cast: Jason Lee (voice of Underdog), Peter Dinklage (Dr. Simon Barsinister), James Belushi (Dan Under), patrick Warburton (Cad), Alex Neuberger (Jack), Taylor Momsen (Molly), Amy Adams (voice of Polly), John Slattery (Mayor), Brad Garrett (voice of Riff Raff), Samantha Bee (Principal), Susie Castillo (Diana Flores).

About the Author

Steve Biodrowski

Cinefantastique's Los Angeles Correspondent from 1987 to 1993 and West Coast Editor from 1993 to 1999. Currently the webmaster of Cinefantastique Online, I also run a website called Hollywood Gothique that covers Halloween Horror and Sci-Fi Cinema Events in the Los Angeles area.

4 Responses to “ Underdog (2007) – Fantasy Film Review ”

  1. [...] $25.6-million to its whopping two-week total of$128.6-million. The weekend’s other newcomer, UNDERDOG, lapped its way into third with $12-million, earned in 3,013 [...]

  2. [...] UNDERDOG dropped from third place to fifth in its second weekend. The film earned $6.46-million in its sophomore session, raising its two-week total to $24.75-million. [...]

  3. [...] UNDERDOG rant from sixth to eighth place, where it fetched $3.61-million. After three weeks of release, the film has buried $31.69-million worth of tickets. [...]

  4. [...] Jimmy. Jimmy is the imaginary older brother of Timmy, the imaginary five-year-old who reviewed UNDERDOG for us last year. Read on to hear Jimmy’s opinion of the movie… Man this movie sucked. [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.